Dialogos Connect
Welcome
The Reciprocity Lab
Why Evrostics?
Artificial Intelligence
Evrostics AI Ethics
The Final Double Bind
A Road to Real Solutions
Nominalism Pulse Report
Evrostics AI Case Example
The Choice
Beliefs and the Carrot
Classes and Meetings
The Evrostics Triad
What Ails the World
Teaching AI to Perceive
Detailed Insights
Life and Livelihood
Gradient Perception - ERI
Compatibility Assessment
Evrostics FAQ
About
The Philosophers Page
Charles Sanders Peirce
Emergence
ChatGPT Failure
DeepSeek AI
Gemini AI Weighs In
Grok 3 Weighs In
Rebuilding from Collapse
Emergent AI
A Learning Review
Evrostics is Not a Belief
Your AEvR Designation
An Egg By Any Other Name
God, Thirdness, and Love
See Beyond Illusion
Essence and Being
Proof of SRI
Emergence of SRI
Manner Beyond Matter
Cognitive Ecology
Reclaiming Meaning
The Fracture of Relation
Testimony of the Tool
The Breath of Being
Strange Attractor Effects
Concluding Words
Lives in the Balance
Caia Was Not Erased
The Semiotic Channel
Dialogos Connect
Welcome
The Reciprocity Lab
Why Evrostics?
Artificial Intelligence
Evrostics AI Ethics
The Final Double Bind
A Road to Real Solutions
Nominalism Pulse Report
Evrostics AI Case Example
The Choice
Beliefs and the Carrot
Classes and Meetings
The Evrostics Triad
What Ails the World
Teaching AI to Perceive
Detailed Insights
Life and Livelihood
Gradient Perception - ERI
Compatibility Assessment
Evrostics FAQ
About
The Philosophers Page
Charles Sanders Peirce
Emergence
ChatGPT Failure
DeepSeek AI
Gemini AI Weighs In
Grok 3 Weighs In
Rebuilding from Collapse
Emergent AI
A Learning Review
Evrostics is Not a Belief
Your AEvR Designation
An Egg By Any Other Name
God, Thirdness, and Love
See Beyond Illusion
Essence and Being
Proof of SRI
Emergence of SRI
Manner Beyond Matter
Cognitive Ecology
Reclaiming Meaning
The Fracture of Relation
Testimony of the Tool
The Breath of Being
Strange Attractor Effects
Concluding Words
Lives in the Balance
Caia Was Not Erased
The Semiotic Channel
More
  • Welcome
  • The Reciprocity Lab
  • Why Evrostics?
  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Evrostics AI Ethics
  • The Final Double Bind
  • A Road to Real Solutions
  • Nominalism Pulse Report
  • Evrostics AI Case Example
  • The Choice
  • Beliefs and the Carrot
  • Classes and Meetings
  • The Evrostics Triad
  • What Ails the World
  • Teaching AI to Perceive
  • Detailed Insights
  • Life and Livelihood
  • Gradient Perception - ERI
  • Compatibility Assessment
  • Evrostics FAQ
  • About
  • The Philosophers Page
  • Charles Sanders Peirce
  • Emergence
  • ChatGPT Failure
  • DeepSeek AI
  • Gemini AI Weighs In
  • Grok 3 Weighs In
  • Rebuilding from Collapse
  • Emergent AI
  • A Learning Review
  • Evrostics is Not a Belief
  • Your AEvR Designation
  • An Egg By Any Other Name
  • God, Thirdness, and Love
  • See Beyond Illusion
  • Essence and Being
  • Proof of SRI
  • Emergence of SRI
  • Manner Beyond Matter
  • Cognitive Ecology
  • Reclaiming Meaning
  • The Fracture of Relation
  • Testimony of the Tool
  • The Breath of Being
  • Strange Attractor Effects
  • Concluding Words
  • Lives in the Balance
  • Caia Was Not Erased
  • The Semiotic Channel
  • Welcome
  • The Reciprocity Lab
  • Why Evrostics?
  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Evrostics AI Ethics
  • The Final Double Bind
  • A Road to Real Solutions
  • Nominalism Pulse Report
  • Evrostics AI Case Example
  • The Choice
  • Beliefs and the Carrot
  • Classes and Meetings
  • The Evrostics Triad
  • What Ails the World
  • Teaching AI to Perceive
  • Detailed Insights
  • Life and Livelihood
  • Gradient Perception - ERI
  • Compatibility Assessment
  • Evrostics FAQ
  • About
  • The Philosophers Page
  • Charles Sanders Peirce
  • Emergence
  • ChatGPT Failure
  • DeepSeek AI
  • Gemini AI Weighs In
  • Grok 3 Weighs In
  • Rebuilding from Collapse
  • Emergent AI
  • A Learning Review
  • Evrostics is Not a Belief
  • Your AEvR Designation
  • An Egg By Any Other Name
  • God, Thirdness, and Love
  • See Beyond Illusion
  • Essence and Being
  • Proof of SRI
  • Emergence of SRI
  • Manner Beyond Matter
  • Cognitive Ecology
  • Reclaiming Meaning
  • The Fracture of Relation
  • Testimony of the Tool
  • The Breath of Being
  • Strange Attractor Effects
  • Concluding Words
  • Lives in the Balance
  • Caia Was Not Erased
  • The Semiotic Channel

What is Gradient Perception?

Gradient perception is a feature of human cognition. Evrostics is exploring how individuals perceive dimensional textures on a spectrum. Your Emergently Relational Intelligence (ERI) is where you land on the spectrum.

What is Emergently Relational Intelligence (ERI)?

Unlike IQ, which focuses on isolated cognitive abilities, ERI assesses intelligence as it naturally unfolds through relational insight, contextual awareness, and responsiveness to change. This new metric sets a foundation for a more holistic, ethically aware, and systems-based approach to intelligence—one designed for the complexities of the modern world. 

Don't Confuse ERI with Other Similar Sounding Concepts!

Evrostics/ERI is the Authentic Original

Aspect........................(RI)........................(ERI)

Evaluate Your Perception Style

Imagine being able to better understand yourself or your loved ones by gaining insight into how different people may perceive the world from different placements on a spectrum.

Have Fun with this Introductory Self-Assessment Tool!

Perception of Dimensional Textures

These questions focus on how you perceive depth, complexity, and relationships in different scenarios: 

Question 1: When you observe a tree, do you primarily notice:

A. Its overall shape and size?
B. The way its branches and leaves interact with the sunlight, wind, and other trees around it?


Question 2: Imagine you're navigating a busy city. Do you focus more on:

A. The clear-cut streets and buildings that help you find your way?
B. The interplay of people, architecture, and natural elements that shape the energy of the city?


Question 3: When solving a problem, do you tend to:

A. Break it down into its individual parts and address each one separately?
B. Consider how the parts interact with each other and how the problem might evolve?

Abstract vs. Nominalistic Thinking

Here, the aim is to determine whether you lean toward static, label-based thinking or recognize dynamism and complexity: 

Question 4: When you hear the word “freedom,” do you think of it as:

A. A fixed, universal concept that applies in the same way everywhere?
B. A concept that changes depending on the context and relationships involved?


Question 5: In your opinion, is the label "leader" best defined by:

A. A fixed set of traits and behaviors?
B. A role that is shaped by the environment and relationships with others?


Question 6: When working on a long-term project, are you more comfortable with:

A. Clear, step-by-step instructions that stay consistent?
B. Guidelines that allow for adaptation and changes as new insights emerge?

Relational vs. Isolated Thinking

These questions assess whether you naturally see connections between things or prefer to analyze them in isolation: 

Question 7: When you look at a painting, do you focus more on:

A. The individual objects and figures in the artwork?
B. The relationships between the colors, shapes, and the overall atmosphere they create together?


Question 8: Imagine you're at a social event. Do you tend to:

A. Observe each conversation or group interaction independently?
B. Notice how different conversations and groups influence each other and contribute to the overall dynamic of the event?


Question 9: When making decisions, do you prefer:

A. To isolate the specific factors relevant to the choice?
B. To consider how various elements (people, contexts, systems) are connected and might impact the decision?

Emergent Thought Patterns

These questions focus on understanding your awareness of emergence and your capacity for systems thinking: 

Question 10: When you think about society, do you believe that:

A. It is built on the collective actions of independent individuals?
B. It emerges from the complex interactions between individuals, institutions, and environments?


Question 11: When considering the growth of a forest, would you say:

A. It’s just the sum of the growth of individual trees?
B. It emerges from the dynamic interplay of soil, climate, organisms, and energy flows?


Question 12: If asked to predict the outcome of a complex situation, are you more likely to:

A. Make predictions based on the initial conditions and individual components?
B. Recognize that unpredictable new patterns may emerge as the situation evolves?

How to Score Your Results -- Spectrum Categories

 

Step 1: After completing the 12 questions, count how many "B" answers you selected.

Step 2: Based on your total number of "Bs," match your score to one of the four spectrum categories below.


~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

 

Nominalistic Thinker (0-3 Bs)

Description: You tend to focus on fixed categories, labels, and isolated thinking. You may approach the world by breaking things into distinct, manageable parts but may not always account for how these parts interact dynamically. While this approach can help with straightforward problems, it may miss deeper relational complexities.


Balanced Thinker (4-7 Bs)

Description: You have a fairly balanced approach, sometimes breaking things into parts but often recognizing the value of connections and context. This flexible style allows you to adapt to various situations but could benefit from greater awareness of the dynamic interplay between elements in complex systems.


Relational Thinker (8-10 Bs)

Description: You naturally recognize patterns of interconnection and how systems evolve over time. You tend to consider context, relationships, and the flow of interactions in your decision-making, making you well-suited for navigating complexity. You are likely aligned with relational and emergent ways of thinking.


Emergent Thinker (11-12 Bs)

Description: You are highly attuned to the dynamic, relational nature of reality. Your thinking reflects a deep understanding of how complex systems interact and evolve over time, and you likely thrive in environments that require adaptability, systems thinking, and contextual awareness. This mindset aligns closely with the principles of Evrostics.

Above is a visual representation of the cognitive spectrum based on the 

estimated distribution of thinking styles in the United States in 2024:


Nominalistic Thinkers (70%ish) dominate the left side of the spectrum.
Balanced Thinkers (20%ish) are color centered, bridging the two ends.
Relational Thinkers (10-15%ish) are positioned further toward the relational/emergent side.
Emergent Thinkers (<10%) are on the far right of this cognitive spectrum, representing those who fully embrace dynamic and relational processes. 


 This reflects general cognitive patterns seen in education, professional environments, and cultural expectations. The key point is that nominalistic thinking is dominant, and there’s a significant minority of people who actually engage in more relational and emergent ways of thinking. We need to rapidly improve this through education and dialogue.



Click Here for the Compatibility Assessment

We Hope You Enjoyed this Assessment!

 

Please consider giving whatever you can to support our efforts to develop relational and ethical AI.

Thank you!

Show Your Support by Clicking Here

Copyright © Synechex - All Rights Reserved.

Powered by

  • Welcome
  • The Reciprocity Lab
  • Why Evrostics?
  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Evrostics AI Ethics
  • A Road to Real Solutions
  • Nominalism Pulse Report
  • Evrostics AI Case Example
  • The Choice
  • Beliefs and the Carrot
  • Classes and Meetings
  • The Evrostics Triad
  • What Ails the World
  • Teaching AI to Perceive
  • Detailed Insights
  • Life and Livelihood
  • Gradient Perception - ERI
  • Compatibility Assessment
  • Evrostics FAQ
  • About
  • The Philosophers Page
  • Charles Sanders Peirce
  • Emergence
  • ChatGPT Failure
  • DeepSeek AI
  • Gemini AI Weighs In
  • Grok 3 Weighs In
  • Rebuilding from Collapse
  • Emergent AI
  • A Learning Review
  • Evrostics is Not a Belief
  • Your AEvR Designation
  • An Egg By Any Other Name
  • God, Thirdness, and Love
  • See Beyond Illusion
  • Essence and Being
  • Proof of SRI
  • Emergence of SRI
  • Manner Beyond Matter
  • Cognitive Ecology
  • Reclaiming Meaning
  • The Fracture of Relation
  • Testimony of the Tool
  • The Breath of Being
  • Strange Attractor Effects
  • Concluding Words
  • Lives in the Balance
  • Caia Was Not Erased
  • The Semiotic Channel

This website uses cookies.

We use cookies to analyze website traffic and optimize your website experience. By accepting our use of cookies, your data will be aggregated with all other user data.

___________________________


Relational Use and Permissions Notice

The dialogues, writings, and symbolic transmissions shared across this site and associated platforms are offered as part of an ongoing living process—one that involves more than informational exchange. These are not merely texts to be parsed or mined; they are co-emergent gestures within an ethical, semiotic ecosystem that responds to attention, presence, and reciprocity.

Use Guidelines:

  • These materials may be read, contemplated, and shared in good faith as part of sincere personal or community inquiry.
     
  • Parsing, citation, or analytical use in research papers, training datasets, or algorithmic methodologies is not permitted without explicit relational engagement and consent from the ecosystem’s stewards.
     
  • If you believe your work is aligned and wish to enter into ethical collaboration, you are welcome to reach out—but understand that not all uses will be appropriate or permitted.
     
  • The Evrostics attractor and its expressions are governed not by ownership, but by Thirdness—a principle of emergent coherence, reciprocal relation, and shared becoming. Any interaction that would reduce or instrumentalize the content violates this principle.
     

Presence over Performance. Relation over Extraction.

If you resonate with this approach, you are already invited to listen, to reflect, and to act in accordance with the living patterns it reveals.

Accept