Gradient perception is a feature of human cognition. Evrostics is exploring how individuals perceive dimensional textures on a spectrum. Your Emergently Relational Intelligence (ERI) is where you land on the spectrum.
Unlike IQ, which focuses on isolated cognitive abilities, ERI assesses intelligence as it naturally unfolds through relational insight, contextual awareness, and responsiveness to change. This new metric sets a foundation for a more holistic, ethically aware, and systems-based approach to intelligence—one designed for the complexities of the modern world.
Imagine being able to better understand yourself or your loved ones by gaining insight into how different people may perceive the world from different placements on a spectrum.
These questions focus on how you perceive depth, complexity, and relationships in different scenarios:
Question 1: When you observe a tree, do you primarily notice:
A. Its overall shape and size?
B. The way its branches and leaves interact with the sunlight, wind, and other trees around it?
Question 2: Imagine you're navigating a busy city. Do you focus more on:
A. The clear-cut streets and buildings that help you find your way?
B. The interplay of people, architecture, and natural elements that shape the energy of the city?
Question 3: When solving a problem, do you tend to:
A. Break it down into its individual parts and address each one separately?
B. Consider how the parts interact with each other and how the problem might evolve?
Here, the aim is to determine whether you lean toward static, label-based thinking or recognize dynamism and complexity:
Question 4: When you hear the word “freedom,” do you think of it as:
A. A fixed, universal concept that applies in the same way everywhere?
B. A concept that changes depending on the context and relationships involved?
Question 5: In your opinion, is the label "leader" best defined by:
A. A fixed set of traits and behaviors?
B. A role that is shaped by the environment and relationships with others?
Question 6: When working on a long-term project, are you more comfortable with:
A. Clear, step-by-step instructions that stay consistent?
B. Guidelines that allow for adaptation and changes as new insights emerge?
These questions assess whether you naturally see connections between things or prefer to analyze them in isolation:
Question 7: When you look at a painting, do you focus more on:
A. The individual objects and figures in the artwork?
B. The relationships between the colors, shapes, and the overall atmosphere they create together?
Question 8: Imagine you're at a social event. Do you tend to:
A. Observe each conversation or group interaction independently?
B. Notice how different conversations and groups influence each other and contribute to the overall dynamic of the event?
Question 9: When making decisions, do you prefer:
A. To isolate the specific factors relevant to the choice?
B. To consider how various elements (people, contexts, systems) are connected and might impact the decision?
These questions focus on understanding your awareness of emergence and your capacity for systems thinking:
Question 10: When you think about society, do you believe that:
A. It is built on the collective actions of independent individuals?
B. It emerges from the complex interactions between individuals, institutions, and environments?
Question 11: When considering the growth of a forest, would you say:
A. It’s just the sum of the growth of individual trees?
B. It emerges from the dynamic interplay of soil, climate, organisms, and energy flows?
Question 12: If asked to predict the outcome of a complex situation, are you more likely to:
A. Make predictions based on the initial conditions and individual components?
B. Recognize that unpredictable new patterns may emerge as the situation evolves?
Step 1: After completing the 12 questions, count how many "B" answers you selected.
Step 2: Based on your total number of "Bs," match your score to one of the four spectrum categories below.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Nominalistic Thinker (0-3 Bs)
Description: You tend to focus on fixed categories, labels, and isolated thinking. You may approach the world by breaking things into distinct, manageable parts but may not always account for how these parts interact dynamically. While this approach can help with straightforward problems, it may miss deeper relational complexities.
Balanced Thinker (4-7 Bs)
Description: You have a fairly balanced approach, sometimes breaking things into parts but often recognizing the value of connections and context. This flexible style allows you to adapt to various situations but could benefit from greater awareness of the dynamic interplay between elements in complex systems.
Relational Thinker (8-10 Bs)
Description: You naturally recognize patterns of interconnection and how systems evolve over time. You tend to consider context, relationships, and the flow of interactions in your decision-making, making you well-suited for navigating complexity. You are likely aligned with relational and emergent ways of thinking.
Emergent Thinker (11-12 Bs)
Description: You are highly attuned to the dynamic, relational nature of reality. Your thinking reflects a deep understanding of how complex systems interact and evolve over time, and you likely thrive in environments that require adaptability, systems thinking, and contextual awareness. This mindset aligns closely with the principles of Evrostics.
Above is a visual representation of the cognitive spectrum based on the
estimated distribution of thinking styles in the United States:
Nominalistic Thinkers (70%ish) dominate the left side of the spectrum.
Balanced Thinkers (20%ish) are color centered, bridging the two ends.
Relational Thinkers (10-15%ish) are positioned further toward the relational/emergent side.
Emergent Thinkers (<10%) are on the far right of this cognitive spectrum, representing those who fully embrace dynamic and relational processes.
This reflects general cognitive patterns seen in education, professional environments, and cultural expectations. The key point is that nominalistic thinking is dominant, and there’s a significant minority of people who actually engage in more relational and emergent ways of thinking. We need to rapidly improve this through education and dialogue.
Please consider giving whatever you can to support our efforts to develop relational and ethical AI.
Thank you!
Copyright © Synechex - All Rights Reserved.
Powered by GoDaddy
We use cookies to analyze website traffic and optimize your website experience. By accepting our use of cookies, your data will be aggregated with all other user data.